<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Nathan Brumand]]></title><description><![CDATA[Nathan Brumand]]></description><link>https://nathanbrumand.hashnode.dev</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2026 00:36:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nathanbrumand.hashnode.dev/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Start With the Work, Not the Tool]]></title><description><![CDATA[I've spent most of my working life on the practical side of business: customers, employees, schedules, suppliers, cash flow, and all the small decisions…]]></description><link>https://nathanbrumand.hashnode.dev/start-with-the-work-not-the-tool-mvwrvnw1</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://nathanbrumand.hashnode.dev/start-with-the-work-not-the-tool-mvwrvnw1</guid><category><![CDATA[AI]]></category><category><![CDATA[business]]></category><category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category><category><![CDATA[Small business]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Brumand]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 19:06:47 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've spent most of my working life on the practical side of business: customers, employees, schedules, suppliers, cash flow, and all the small decisions that never make it into a press release. That shapes how I look at AI. I'm interested in one question: does this help a real business do its work better, this month, at a cost that makes sense? If the answer is unclear, I'd rather say so than pretend.</p>
<h2>The demo vs Monday morning</h2>
<p>Most AI demos are impressive. They're also clean. The data is tidy, the request is clear, and nobody is interrupting with a customer on the other line.</p>
<p>Real businesses don't look like that. Information lives in inboxes, spreadsheets, notebooks and people's heads. When a tool that looked great in a demo meets that reality, it usually needs more setup, more checking and more patience than anyone expected.</p>
<p>That isn't a reason to avoid AI. It's a reason to bring it in with open eyes. The useful question isn't "what can this tool do?" It's "what does our work actually look like, and where would help make a difference?"</p>
<h2>Understand the process first</h2>
<p>One lesson years in business taught me, long before AI: a new tool rarely fixes a process nobody understands. It usually makes the confusion faster.</p>
<p>Before adding AI anywhere, answer a few plain questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>What exactly happens today? Who does the task, how often, and how long does it take?</li>
<li>What does "good" look like? If you can't describe a good result, you can't check whether a tool produced one.</li>
<li>Where does it go wrong? Mistakes and delays are usually where the real opportunity is.</li>
<li>Who owns the result? Every task needs a person who is responsible for it, with or without AI.</li>
</ul>
<h2>The human always decides</h2>
<p>AI can gather, sort, draft and suggest. A person decides.</p>
<p>Anything that affects a customer, an employee, money or a commitment should pass through a human who reads it and owns it. The tool can prepare a reply; someone approves it before it goes out. That's about responsibility and trust, not only about avoiding errors.</p>
<h2>Try one task</h2>
<p>If you run a small business or lead a team with no tech staff, keep it simple:</p>
<ol>
<li>Pick one task that wastes time every week.</li>
<li>Note how long it takes now, even roughly.</li>
<li>Try a tool on it for a few weeks, checking the output yourself.</li>
<li>Keep it only if it clearly helps. If it doesn't, drop it and move on.</li>
</ol>
<p>There's no prize for adopting the most tools. There's real value in adopting the right one.</p>
<hr />
<p><em>Adapted from my longer piece on</em> <a href="https://nathanbrumand.com/blog/netanel-brumand-ai-in-business/">nathanbrumand.com</a>. <em>I'm Nathan Brumand. I write</em> The AI-Business Connection <em>about practical AI in business. More:</em> <a href="https://nathanbrumand.com">nathanbrumand.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Start With the Work, Not the Tool]]></title><description><![CDATA[I've spent most of my working life on the practical side of business: customers, employees, schedules, suppliers, cash flow, and all the small decisions…]]></description><link>https://nathanbrumand.hashnode.dev/start-with-the-work-not-the-tool</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://nathanbrumand.hashnode.dev/start-with-the-work-not-the-tool</guid><category><![CDATA[AI]]></category><category><![CDATA[business]]></category><category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category><category><![CDATA[Small business]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Brumand]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 13:24:15 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Start With the Work, Not the Tool</h1>
<p>I've spent most of my working life on the practical side of business: customers, employees, schedules, suppliers, cash flow, and all the small decisions that never make it into a press release. That shapes how I look at AI. I'm interested in one question: does this help a real business do its work better, this month, at a cost that makes sense? If the answer is unclear, I'd rather say so than pretend.</p>
<h2>The demo vs Monday morning</h2>
<p>Most AI demos are impressive. They're also clean. The data is tidy, the request is clear, and nobody is interrupting with a customer on the other line.</p>
<p>Real businesses don't look like that. Information lives in inboxes, spreadsheets, notebooks and people's heads. When a tool that looked great in a demo meets that reality, it usually needs more setup, more checking and more patience than anyone expected.</p>
<p>That isn't a reason to avoid AI. It's a reason to bring it in with open eyes. The useful question isn't "what can this tool do?" It's "what does our work actually look like, and where would help make a difference?"</p>
<h2>Understand the process first</h2>
<p>One lesson years in business taught me, long before AI: a new tool rarely fixes a process nobody understands. It usually makes the confusion faster.</p>
<p>Before adding AI anywhere, answer a few plain questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>What exactly happens today? Who does the task, how often, and how long does it take?</li>
<li>What does "good" look like? If you can't describe a good result, you can't check whether a tool produced one.</li>
<li>Where does it go wrong? Mistakes and delays are usually where the real opportunity is.</li>
<li>Who owns the result? Every task needs a person who is responsible for it, with or without AI.</li>
</ul>
<h2>The human always decides</h2>
<p>AI can gather, sort, draft and suggest. A person decides.</p>
<p>Anything that affects a customer, an employee, money or a commitment should pass through a human who reads it and owns it. The tool can prepare a reply; someone approves it before it goes out. That's about responsibility and trust, not only about avoiding errors.</p>
<h2>Try one task</h2>
<p>If you run a small business or lead a team with no tech staff, keep it simple:</p>
<ol>
<li>Pick one task that wastes time every week.</li>
<li>Note how long it takes now, even roughly.</li>
<li>Try a tool on it for a few weeks, checking the output yourself.</li>
<li>Keep it only if it clearly helps. If it doesn't, drop it and move on.</li>
</ol>
<p>There's no prize for adopting the most tools. There's real value in adopting the right one.</p>
<hr />
<p><em>Adapted from my longer piece on</em> <a href="https://nathanbrumand.com/blog/netanel-brumand-ai-in-business/">nathanbrumand.com</a>. <em>I'm Nathan Brumand. I write</em> The AI-Business Connection <em>about practical AI in business. More:</em> <a href="https://nathanbrumand.com">nathanbrumand.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[AI in Business, Without the Hype]]></title><description><![CDATA[Hi, I'm Nathan Brumand. I'm an entrepreneur, and this is the first post of The AI-Business Connection. I have nearly 20 years in business in the US. Most…]]></description><link>https://nathanbrumand.hashnode.dev/ai-in-business-without-the-hype</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://nathanbrumand.hashnode.dev/ai-in-business-without-the-hype</guid><category><![CDATA[AI]]></category><category><![CDATA[Small business]]></category><category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Brumand]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 13:30:30 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>How companies can actually adopt AI: what saves time, where to start, and where people have to stay in charge</h2>
<hr />
<p>Hi, I'm Nathan Brumand. I'm an entrepreneur, and this is the first post of The AI-Business Connection.</p>
<p>I have nearly 20 years in business in the US. Most of that time went into the unglamorous parts: hiring, cash flow, answering the phone, showing up when you said you would, and fixing things when they go wrong. Today my focus is one question: how can a business actually use AI to run better, without wasting money, chasing every new tool, or losing the human judgment that customers and teams rely on?</p>
<p>That's what this newsletter is about: AI in business, written for the people who have to make it work.</p>
<h3>Why I'm writing this</h3>
<p>Almost every business leader I talk to has heard that AI is going to change everything. Far fewer have been told, in plain language, what it can do for <em>their</em> business this quarter, what it will cost them in time and attention, and what can go wrong.</p>
<p>A lot of what's out there is either written for engineers or it's a sales pitch. Leaders get impressive demos that don't fit how their business really works. Meanwhile the real problems haven't changed: customers waiting too long for an answer, leads without follow-up, hours lost to scheduling, reports and paperwork, and too little time left for the work that matters.</p>
<p>I think AI can help with a lot of that. I also think a lot of it is overpromised. My goal here is to sort one from the other, honestly, from the point of view of someone who has run businesses, not just read about them.</p>
<h3>Where AI tends to save time</h3>
<p>I'll go deeper on each of these in future posts, but these are the areas where I see the most practical value today, in companies of almost any size:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Responding to customers.</strong> Answering common questions and new inquiries quickly, including after hours.</li>
<li><strong>Follow-up.</strong> Reminders, check-ins and next steps that everyone means to send and many people forget.</li>
<li><strong>Scheduling and coordination.</strong> Booking, confirming and rescheduling without a long back-and-forth.</li>
<li><strong>First drafts.</strong> Emails, proposals, job descriptions, website text and internal documents. A person still edits them. Nobody starts from a blank page.</li>
<li><strong>Summarizing.</strong> Turning long threads, meetings, notes or documents into something a decision-maker can read in two minutes.</li>
</ul>
<p>None of this is magic. It's repetitive work, and repetitive work is where these tools are strongest.</p>
<h3>Where to start</h3>
<p>Whether you run a five-person shop or lead a team inside a larger company, the advice is the same: don't start with a big transformation project. Start with one task that wastes time every week. Write down how long it takes. Try a tool on it for a few weeks, check the results yourself, and decide whether it really helped. If it did, keep it and pick the next task. If it didn't, drop it without guilt.</p>
<p>Small, boring and measurable beats big and impressive. Strategy matters, but it should be built on what you've actually seen work.</p>
<h3>Where a human has to stay in charge</h3>
<p>This is the principle that will run through everything I write here: <strong>AI can do the preparation. People make the decisions.</strong></p>
<p>An AI tool can draft a reply, suggest a time slot or summarize a request. It shouldn't be the one setting prices, making commitments to a customer, handling an upset client or deciding who to hire. Anything that touches money, promises or a relationship needs a person who reads it and owns it. That's not only about avoiding mistakes. Customers and employees can tell when nobody is really there, and trust is hard to win back.</p>
<h3>Honest about the hype</h3>
<p>I'll keep this plain. No invented numbers, no "this tool will 10x your business," no pretending something works when it doesn't. When I'm not sure about something, I'll say so. When I try something that fails, I'll tell you about that too, because the mistakes are often more useful than the wins.</p>
<h3>What you can expect</h3>
<p>Every week, I'll send one post on topics like:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>AI strategy and adoption.</strong> How to decide what to try first, how to roll it out, and how to bring a team along.</li>
<li><strong>Practical AI, task by task.</strong> Specific jobs in a business and how AI can (or can't) help with them.</li>
<li><strong>Small and local businesses.</strong> A recurring angle: simple first steps for owners with no tech team and no time to spare.</li>
<li><strong>Keeping the human in charge.</strong> Where to draw the line, and how to check what the tools produce.</li>
<li><strong>Hype vs. reality.</strong> What's ready today, what's not, and how to tell the difference before you pay for it.</li>
<li><strong>Lessons from the road.</strong> What nearly 20 years in business taught me, and the perspective of an entrepreneur building here.</li>
</ul>
<h3>One request</h3>
<p>Reply and tell me: <strong>what's the biggest time-waster in your business right now?</strong> Or, if you've already tried AI at work, what worked and what didn't? I read every reply, and your answers will shape what I write next.</p>
<p>Thanks for being here at the start.</p>
<p>Nathan</p>
<p>More about me and my work: <a href="https://nathanbrumand.com">nathanbrumand.com</a></p>
<hr />
<p>I'm Nathan Brumand. I write The AI-Business Connection, a weekly newsletter about using AI in business without the hype. The original post is on Substack: <a href="https://nathanbrumand.substack.com/p/ai-in-business-without-the-hype">https://nathanbrumand.substack.com/p/ai-in-business-without-the-hype</a>. More about me: <a href="https://nathanbrumand.com">https://nathanbrumand.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>